I have another thought for you. Porches don't add a lot of value to a house. They are enjoyable and do help sell a house, but heated square footage is worth more. Have you considered bumping out the front of the house to enclose the porch area. If the ceiling joist goes all the way out to the roof line, that is they are cantilevered right now, this might not cost much more than what you are planning right now.
If the floor joists for the porch are cantilevered from the house, that will be even better. If both the porch ceiling and floor are cantilevered, you can take down the brick columns that are so out of place for your house. If not, then it gets more complicated but it can be done. Then build a balcony out from there, a sliding glass door or french doors to the balcony and you have the perfect spot for a morning espresso.
Thank so much for those ideas, A. Bruce and Keith. Here is what I can "photoshoped" in just so I can visualize it
I think I can make it within $5K, since I dont change any existing structure, 1/2 of it save on permit. Just add a foot or so extension to the deck, between the columns, make it a 2 half round balconies, with belly type wrought iron railing. I saw and love it. The stucco and stone work takes time, but I can do it slowly.
Any comment or suggestions? paint color? stone color? etc
That looks nice.
That is an improvement.
Be aware that stone and tile are very heavy, so you will need to build your steps and porch to withstand it.
I am getting close.
The columns would have stone veneer, so it should be light, the deck/porch would have cement layer but not stone, dont know how yet, but the existing cement surface is durable.
Yes, the steps need to be reconstructed, that is where I might hire out.
One more compare with the trims
Thanks so much A. Bruce and Keith for guiding me thru this
I like option one better because it incorporates the windows with the trim, as opposed to the other where the windows are not trimmed. As for color, you can obviously go with any color combination you like. If you're going to be doing that much work to the front of the house, you'll likely be repainting the whole facade to blend it all together. I personally like the trim to contrast with the body color, I would think that something to pick up the color of the brick veneer would be good, which would tie the trim and brick work together.
If this is up for a vote, and I think you can do a survey here for people to vote on, my vote would go for option 1. Option 2 makes the trim stand out too much.
For whatever reason, my last post went to "moderator approval", which is short for "we'll never see that post again".
I like option 1 the best, with the arch between the windows. IMHO it needs to be there for balance. It really makes that bland wall pop and ties the whole wall together. Also, option 1 trims the windows in the larger trim, which again helps to tie it all together.
The stairs can do anything you want them to do, I'd stick with a more traditional straight stair than having it curve or flair to mimic the arches. You'll also add quite a bit of expense to get fancy with the stairs, since stairs are not an easy thing to do.
The trim foam should be available at any supplier of stucco products. You'll probably have to go to a specialty supplier and not Evil Orange or it's ilk. Not sure what you mean about being able to customize the trim. It is simply foam, so you can cut and bend it in any manner you like. If you're talking about custom profiles, you might be able to get something special or make your own, but in all honesty, I don't think the time, hassle, or expense would be worth it. Stick with a stock profile.
This, IMO, is a personal preference call. I personally don't care for concrete porches, though they are extremely durable and easy to maintain. Wood is nice, but it tends to splinter and check over time, not to mention rot if it's not protected. Since you're veneering the columns, what about choosing a similar colored flagstone for your finished porch surface?
I didn't care for the arch, that is what really turned me off to option 2 because it stood out too much, but those colors made the arches seem unbalanced as well. Spanish architecture is about subtle color changes and earthtones. The arch is OK in option 1 because it doesn't stand out, but in option 2, it becomes an eyesore. It looks like a unibrow.